“Poor
Kashmir, it lies in the Himalayan ramparts where the borders of India, Pakistan
and China rub together. Reality mocks its beauty. There is no escaping the
permeating meloncholy of a land that lies under the gun.” — Trevor Fishlock
The
indelible factors of geography in terms of ‘location,’ ‘space’ and ‘terrain’ in
shaping the destiny of nations remains profound. The conflict that has been
going on ‘for’ and ‘in’ the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) for seven
decades is a prime example; it is the State’s locational position on the face
of the earth for China, India and Pakistan that is driving the triangular
competition in which Pakistan’s virulence is being used both as the means to
‘contain’ India, and her territory, including what she occupies to act as a
spring board for China’s regional outreach.
Contributing
to the factors of geography are vestiges of the past. Shadows of history fall
long and keep festering if the end state is allowed to remain open ended and if
actions are not grounded in strategic logic. Such has been the case of Kashmir
– both in handling Pakistan and China and failing to integrate the Kashmiri people. In the absence
of the national will to correct what the Chinese call as ‘historic mistakes,’
outrages in the form of periodic sabre rattling and violence would continue –
Keran and Samba are merely the recent of the many examples. While mistakes of
the past cannot be undone and war is never a good option, corrective measures
within a well calibrated operating matrix are always possible.
Though
stating the obvious, it is important to highlight that the map is intended to
draw attention to the adverse balance sheet after seven decades of conflict;
out of the 2,22,236 square kms that originally comprised the Princely State of
J & K, 56 percent has already passed under the control of China and
Pakistan. The mutilated state of J&K is marked in black and red
respectively-lines that have been drawn with blood of soldiers who continue
their unending vigil in the absence of a coherent national strategy. At the
same time the map reiterates Kashmir’s geographical proximity with Afghanistan,
with which it shares a land border, and the proximity of the energy rich Central
Asian Republics. Kashmir’s ‘locational’ relevance for India, China and Pakistan
has always been significant and it has become a driver in its own right for the
perpetual state of conflict with Pakistan and a reality which has the potential
for keeping the Sino-Indian relations adversarial.
The
triangular strategic competition between China and Pakistan on one side and
India on the other is remicent of the Great Game of yesteryears; the aims and
ends may have changed, but Kashmir’s strategic value as an avenue for Great
Powers, remains a significant factor for conflict. China wants to develop her
Silk Route through her territory (Gilgit-Baltistan) and India (ideally) would
like to develop energy routes to the CAR nations through Afghanistan, which are
best accessed through her territory/Pakistan. Since the aims are not
complementary and there is no reason to expect a diplomatic solution, the ‘K’
factor and the dynamics it generates would add to the volatility and exacerbate
the competition. If the frequency and scale of incidents of the current year
are any indication, preliminary moves for setting the stage to exploit the post
2014 situation are already underway.
The
aim is to revisit the geo-strategic realities of J&K and argue the point
that despite the desire to further the Indo-Pak peace process, unless there is
a fundamental shift in Pakistan’s stance wrt Kashmir, there ‘cannot’ and
‘should not’ be any half baked solution. Given Kashmir’s emotive resonance and
charged atmospherics, there is little that discussions and platitudes can
accomplish. The reality that stares India in the face is that China’s rise is
resulting in her outreach to the Arabian Sea and this requires her to
consolidate in Gilgit Baltistan. At the same time, India’s future cannot be
held hostage to a toxic and tottering Pakistan. How the situation may play out
in geo-strategic terms remains uncertain, but what is certain is the fact that
conflict which has been a constant for the region would continue, though its
nature and tenor may undergo a change. How, where and in what shape Pakistan
will feature and what would be China’s role in pursuing her regional goals will
decide the outcome. At the same time, India cannot condense to pledge her
future in what portends to be an uncertain environment.
Harsh
that it might sound, but the bane for Kashmir and her people ‘is’ and
‘has’ been her strategic relevance and
behind the protracted Indo-Pak conflict, obfuscrated under layers of misleading
narratives, the core reason is ‘territorial’ –religion is merely the currency
and the cover for the conflict. On the other hand, with China there is no need
to obfuscate the raison-de-etre for the conflict – it is squarely
Kashmir’s locational value as an access
point and as an avenue. It was Kashmir’s pivotal location that was the reason
for generating conflict for the state during the Great Game played between
Czarist Russia and Imperial Britain. The only change that has come with the
passage of time is that the actors have changed to India on one side and China and
Pakistan on the other.
What
has not changed is the fact that Kashmir which provided the avenue for ingress
into the plains of the sub-continent remains as important, perhaps even greater
since China is planning to develop her Silk Routes to the Arabian Sea coast and
to West Asia and to the Middle East. There is no mitigating the fact that
Afghanistan that has remained at the cusp of conflict remains fragile, and at
the same time her locational relevance and economic importance has gone up
exponentially in the latest version of the game. Compounding the situation is
the issue of river waters since Kashmir is either the source or conduit of the
rivers for both India and Pakistan, the war for control of water resources will
exacerbate tensions
Field
Marshal Ayub Khan was candid in stating Pakistan’s compulsions to attempt to
capture the state:“The very fact that Pakistan had to be content with the
waters of the three western rivers (in accordance with the Indus water Treaty)
underlined the importance for us of having physical control over the upper
reaches for their maximum utilisation for the growing needs of Pakistan.”Syed
Salahuddin, the Chairman of the United Jihad Council, the umbrella organisation
cording the Pakistan sponsored Jihad in J & K graphically stated: “Kashmir
is the source from where all of Pakistan’s water resources originate. If Pakistan
loses its battle with India, it will become a desert.”In view of the foregoing,
Kashmir and the immediate region would remain a hotspot and for India,
remaining on the back-foot as a policy would be counterproductive in
geo-strategic terms and grievously retard her potential.
Strategic
backdrop. The Cease Fire Line delineated
at the Karachi Agreement of 27 Jul 1949, accepted the de facto splitting of the
state. On one hand, the creation of POK provided Pakistan a viable buffer
against possible Indian aggression opposite her heartland, which translated to
a great military advantage. By occupying Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan gained
another significant strategic advantage, whose importance has grown with time.
Pakistan’s control over this strategic region has opened up multi-dimensional
spheres for cooperation/collusion with China. At the same time, the occupation
of Aksai Chin and the territorial belt running to the southern tip of the
Indo-Tibetan border in East Ladakh has not only put India in a perpetual defensive,
but the loss of strategic passes in 1962 (Chang La, Jara La, Charding La and
the like) restrict her options and place India at a disadvantage.
When
seen holistically, there can be no denial that these developments restrict
India’s strategic options whose effect is expected to increase, as the
situation gets adversarial. Since Pakistan is increasingly being seen by China
as a means and end to further her regional strategic objectives, especially
against India, this exacerbates the competition and portends further conflict
for Kashmir as the state is physically the geo-strategic fulcrum for Sino-Pak
collusion against India. In view of this growing reality, India’s strategic
future in Kashmir needs a re-appraisal. Some geo-strategic issues that merit
attention are postulated.
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें