Utrakhand,
is the 27th state of India carved out of the Himalayan region and adjoining
north-western districts of Uttar Pradesh in the year 2000. It's a sacred place
for the Hindus, as two of the most sacred rivers, the Ganga at Gangotri and the
Yamuna at Yamunotri originate from Utrakhand. Along with it, temples like
Badrinath and Kedarnath form the Chota Char Dham, for Hindu pilgrims to
Utrakhand.
In
June 2013, the Himalayan region witnessed heavy rainfall that triggered
devastating floods and landslides in Utrakhand. The floods left a trail of
destruction, over 70,000 pilgrims and tourists were trapped in various places
who were rescued. There was huge damage to the infrastructure and urban
construction in the state. Various reasons are attributed to the tragedy. Some
blame it on nature, other call it a manmade calamity waiting in the wings.
Various suggestions are made to avoid such large scale destruction and to be
better prepared for such eventuality next time.
Reasons
for Calamity
The
forests of the region are an important reservoir of biodiversity; as they
provide protection against soil erosion and increased flooding in the plains.
One of the reasons for the Utrakhand tragedy is attributed to the extraction of
forests resources of the region. The huge deforestation led to increased
vulnerability to the floods and landslides that got exposed in the recent
floods. The region's other key resource is the water that flows from high
glaciers and mountains to the plains. Currently, there is a mad rush to build
run-of-the-river projects and dams across the region to generate hydro power.
While dams are needed to meet energy requirements, building them is a
construction-intensive activity. It involves blasting, excavation, debris
dumping, movement of heavy machinery, diversion of forests and rivers.
It
was seen that poorly planned dams in Utrakhand which were constructed without
paying heed to their environmental impact was one of the reasons why floods
turned so devastating in the state. Since Utrakhand holds special place for the
Hindus, a large number of the pilgrims make a beeline to the state. The monsoon
season also coincides with the peak pilgrim season and people in large numbers
from across the nation come to visit Hindu holy sites in the state. These
places become overcrowded and their cumulative impact poses a threat to the
environment of the region.
It's
said that recent Utrakhand calamity was a classical case of how commercial
interests can open the gates to disaster. Road construction activity to cater
to the pilgrims and tourists went on unchecked. Apart from convenience and
comfort, ever increasing economic opportunities in the vicinity of the roads
encouraged people to settle down in the proximity of the roads, even if it implies
being exposed to disaster risk. Increasing tourist and pilgrim traffic further
exacerbated this tendency. The huge deluge of urban settlement in Utrakhand was
because it was located in the disaster risk zone.
The
huge amount of urbanization going on in the fragile mountainous area without
any consideration of the environmental impact aggravated the problem. The
hotels and lodges in most of the cases come up in the most fragile areas of the
state. The unplanned urban growth in Utrakhand is considered to be the key
factors for magnifying the human tragedy in the state. The recent Utrakhand
floods suggest that due to the given reasons, the risk-prone and ecologically
fragile region of the state became vulnerable to the nature's fury.
Now,
in its aftermath its required to build a strategy to prevent such disaster in
the future. This strategy has to take into account the vulnerability of the
region and the ways to protect its environment. First of all, the Himalayan
states like Utrakhand should build a viable and sustainable forest-based
economy. A common policy should be evolved to value the forests better for
better use. This policy should include the voices and concerns of local
communities, dependent on forests for their agriculture and basic needs. A
comprehensive planning should be made centring on forests be used for building
local economies.
Then
the strategy for water development must balance the opportunity for energy and
threat to livelihood, particularly in the age of changing climate and hydrology.
It is feared that the hydrology will be impacted because of climate
change—and extreme events. In such case the hydro projects in Utrakhand
should be reviewed and if needed even scrapped. The ecosystem-based tourism
should be developed with safeguards and local benefits. There is need to
promote homestead tourism, instead of hotel tourism, based on policy
incentives. These incentives would include fiscal benefits provided to
house-owners for providing tourist related facilities.
There
is need for an inventory of key pilgrimage sites in Utrakhand, with an
understanding of its ecological capacity based on location and fragility. Then
there is need to control the number of visitors to the important pilgrimage
sites based on the carrying capacity estimates. There should be a ban on
construction of roads for the movement of people within 10 km of the
high-altitude pilgrimage areas. There should be areas marked as special zones,
which are to be maintained with minimal human interference. There is need to
build policies for sustainable urbanisation in the state. The towns need to be
planned, particularly keeping in mind the rush of summer tourists.
The
Utrakhand flood teaches us that we must learn to build sustainable models for
pilgrim-based tourism in the fragile regions of the country. There is a problem
of pollution, litter and solid waste disposal in all the tourist sites. To
control this, a tourism tax for entry into fragile ecosystems should be charged
exponentially. An action plan to create facilities for tourists, particular
facilities for sanitation and for garbage disposal should be made out of such
revenue. There should be high parking charges in fragile areas of hill towns to
restrict the number of vehicles and reduce pollution and congestion.
Finally,
in order to build local interest in these areas, rules to give communities
living in the area advantage of the pilgrimage activities are framed and
implemented vigorously. The recent Utrakhand foods bear resemblance to 2004
Tsunami the coastal regions of the east coast of India. In its wake a costal
disaster management plan that was formulated for better preparedness in future.
A similar proposal can be made for the preparation of disaster management plan
for the hill regions particularly the Himalayan region of the country. These
suggestions and more can come handy in checking the calamities like Utrakhand
that has occurred due to cloud burst, heavy rains and causing unprecedented
floods.
कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:
एक टिप्पणी भेजें