शनिवार, 16 फ़रवरी 2013

भारत के गवर्नर जनरलों की सूची


फोर्ट विलियम प्रेसीडेंसी के गवर्नर (बंगाल), 1774-1833

S.No.
नाम
गवर्नर (से लेकर)
गवर्नर (तक)
1
वॉरेन हेस्टिंग्स
20 अक्टूबर 1773
1 फ़रवरी 1785
2
सर जॉन मैकफर्सन
(कार्यकारी)
1 फ़रवरी 1785
12 सितंबर 1786
3
अर्ल कॉर्नवॉलिस
12 सितंबर 1786
28 अक्टूबर 1793
4
सर जॉन शोर
28 अक्टूबर 1793
मार्च 1798.
5
सर अलर्ड क्लार्क
(कार्यकारी)
मार्च 1798
18 मई 1798
6
अर्ल ऑफ मॉर्निंगटन
18 मई 1798
30 जुलाई 1805
7
मार्कस कॉर्नवॉलिस
30 जुलाई 1805
5 अक्टूबर 1805
8
सर जॉर्ज बारलो, बीटी
(कार्यकारी)
10 अक्टूबर 1805
31 जुलाई 1807
9
लॉर्ड मिंटो
31 जुलाई 1807
4 अक्टूबर 1813
10
अर्ल ऑफ मोइरा
4 अक्टूबर 1813
9 जनवरी 1823
11
जॉन ऐडम्स
(कार्यकारी)
9 जनवरी 1823
1 अगस्त 1823
12
लॉर्ड एमहर्स्ट
1 अगस्त 1823
13 मार्च 1828
13
विलियम बटरवर्थ बेले
(कार्यकारी)
13 मार्च 1828
4 जुलाई 1828
14
लार्ड विलियम बेन्टिक
4 जुलाई 1828
1833
भारत के गवर्नर-जनरल, 1833-1858

14
लोर्ड विलियम बेनटिक
1833
20  मार्च 1835
15
सर चार्ल्स मेटकाल्फे,
बीटी
(कार्यकारी)
20 मार्च  1835
 मार्च 1836
16
लॉर्ड ऑकलैंड
 मार्च 1836
28 फरबरी 1842
17
लॉर्ड एलेनबरो
28 फरबरी 1842
जून  1844
18
विलियम विल्बरफोर्स बर्ड
(कार्यकारी)
  जून 1844
23 जुलाई  1844
19
सर हेनरी हार्डिंग
23 जुलाई  1844
12 जनवरी 1848
20
अर्ल ऑफ डलहौजी
12 जनवरी  1848
28 फरबरी 1856
21
विस्काउंट कैनिंग
28 फरबरी  1856
1 नवंबर  1858
22
विस्काउंट कैनिंग
1 नवम्बर 1858
21 मार्च 1862
23
अर्ल ऑफ एल्गिन
21 मार्च 1862
20 नवम्बर 1863
24
सर रॉबर्ट नेपियर
(कार्यकारी)
21 नवम्बर 1863
2 दिसम्बर 1863
25
सर विलियम डेनिसन
(कार्यकारी)
2 दिसम्बर 1863
12 जनवरी 1864
भारत के गवर्नर जनरल और वायसराय, 1858-1947

26
सर जॉन लॉरेंस, बीटी
12 जनवरी 1864
12 जनवरी 1869
27
अर्ल ऑफ मेयो
12 जनवरी 1869
8 फ़रवरी 1872
28
सर जॉन स्ट्रेची
(कार्यकारी)
9 फ़रवरी 1872
23 फ़रवरी 1872
29
लॉर्ड नेपियर
(कार्यकारी)
24 फ़रवरी 1872
3 मई 1872
30
लॉर्ड नॉर्थब्रुक
3 मई 1872
12 अप्रैल 1876
31
लॉर्ड लिटन
12 अप्रैल 1876
8 जून 1880
32
मार्कस ऑफ रिपन
8 जून 1880
13 दिसम्बर 1884
33
अर्ल ऑफ डफरिन
13 दिसम्बर 1884
10 दिसम्बर 1888
34
मार्कस ऑफ लैंसडाउन
10 दिसम्बर 1888
11 अक्टूबर 1894
35
अर्ल ऑफ एल्गिन
11 अक्टूबर 1894
6 जनवरी 1899
36
लॉर्ड कर्जन ऑफ केडलस्टोन
6 जनवरी 1899
18 नवम्बर 1905
37
अर्ल ऑफ मिंटो
18 नवम्बर 1905
23 नवम्बर 1910
38
लॉर्ड हार्डिंग ऑफ पेनशर्ट्स
23 नवम्बर 1910
4 अप्रैल 1916
39
लॉर्ड चेम्सफोर्ड
4 अप्रैल 1916
2 अप्रैल 1921
40
अर्ल ऑफ रीडिंग
2 अप्रैल 1921
3 अप्रैल 1926
41
लॉर्ड इरविन
3 अप्रैल 1926
18 अप्रैल 1931
42
अर्ल ऑफ विलिंगडन
18 अप्रैल 1931
18 अप्रैल 1936
43
मार्कस ऑफ लिनलिथगो
18 अप्रैल 1936
1 अक्टूबर 1943
44
विकांट वेवल
1 अक्टूबर 1943
21 फ़रवरी 1947
45
बर्मा के विकांट माउंटबेटन
21 फ़रवरी 1947
15 अगस्त 1947
भारतीय संघ के गवर्नर-जनरल, 1947-1950

1
बर्मा के विकांट माउंटबेटन
15 अगस्त 1947
21 जून 1948
2
सी. राजगोपालाचारी
21 जून 1948
26 जनवरी 1950


Economics vocabulary start from 'u'


Unemployment
The number of people of working age without a job is usually expressed as an unemployment rate, a percentage of the workforce. This rate generally rises and falls in step with the business cycle--cyclical unemployment. But some joblessness is not caused by the cycle, being structural unemployment. There are also voluntary unemployment and involuntary unemployment. Some people who are not in work have no interest in getting a job and probably should not be regarded as part of the workforce. Others choose to be out of work briefly while they look for, or are waiting to start, a new job. This is known as frictional unemployment. In the 1950s, the Phillips curve seemed to show that policymakers could reduce unemployment by having higher inflation. Economists now say there is a Nairu (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment). In most markets, prices change to keep supply and demand in equilibrium; in the labour market, wages are often sticky, being slow to fall when demand declines or supply increases. In these situations, unemployment often increases. One way to tackle this may be to boost demand. Another is to increase labour market flexibility.
Unemployment trap
When unemployed people who receive benefits, either from the government or from private charity, are deterred from taking a new job because the reduction or removal of benefit if they do will make them worse off. Also known as the poverty trap, it can be addressed, to an extent, by continuing to pay benefit for a while to unemployed people returning to work.
Unions
In developed countries, at least, trade union membership and influence has declined over the past three decades. Fewer wages are now set by collective bargaining, and far fewer working days are lost to strikes. Unions, which are in effect a cartel of workers, probably make unemployment higher than it would be without them, as collective bargaining often pushes wages above the level that would bring labour supply and demand into equilibrium. These higher wages increase supply and reduce demand, with the result that there are more jobless people. Unions thus deepen a conflict between those in the labour market who are insiders, that is, union members, and those who are outsiders, typically non-unionised, poorly paid or jobless people. However, unions can combat the excessive market power of some firms, particularly when the firms (or a government) dominate a particular job market. They can support workers who are badly treated by management. They may sometimes provide an efficient, and thus valuable, channel for communication between workers and managers, particularly in countries such as Germany, where conflict between management and unions is viewed as unhealthy.
Usury
Charging interest, or, at least, an exorbitant rate of interest. Plato and Aristotle reckoned that charging interest was 'contrary to the nature of things'; Cato considered it on a par with homicide. For many centuries, the Catholic Church regarded as sinful the charging of any interest by lenders and it was not allowed in catholic countries, although Jews were exempted, provided they did not charge excessive rates. According to pope Benedict xiv, in 1745, interest should be regarded as a sin because "the creditor desires more than he has given".
In most modern economies, interest is recognized as a crucial part of the economic system, a reward to the lender for the risk taken in making a loan. Even so, most developed countries have some form of usury law imposing limits on how high interest charges can be. These aim to protect borrowers from being exploited by unscrupulous loan sharks.
Utility
Economist-speak for a good thing; a measure of satisfaction. Underlying most economic theory is the assumption that people do things because doing so gives them utility. People want as much utility as they can get. However, the more they have the less difference an additional unit of utility will make - there is diminishing marginal utility. Utility is not the same as utilitarianism, a political philosophy based on achieving the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
A tricky question is how to measure utility. Money does not (entirely) capture it. You can get richer without becoming more satisfied. So some economists have tried to calculate broader measures of happiness. They have found that people with jobs are much happier than unemployed people. Low inflation also makes people happier. Extra income increases happiness a bit, but not much. In many countries incomes have risen sharply in recent years, but national surveys of subjective well being have stayed flat. Within countries, comparing people across the income distribution, richer does mean happier, but the effect is not large. Married people are often happier than single people; couples without children happier than couples with; women happier than men; white people happier than black people; well-educated people happier than uneducated people; the self-employed happier than employees; and retired people happier than economically active people. Happiness generally decreases until you are in your 30s, and then starts rising again. Other economists are dismissive of such studies. They argue that people are rational maxi misers of their own utility, so, by definition, whatever they do maximizes their utility.

शुक्रवार, 15 फ़रवरी 2013

शिक्षा का अधिकार


भारतीय संविधान में 86 वें संविधान संशोधन द्वारा 2000 मे शिक्षा के अधिकार को मूल अधिकार घोषित किया गया । इसके द्वारा संविधान के अनुच्छेद 21 में नयी धारा 21 (अ) जोड़ा गया । इसमें कहा गया कि राज्य 6 से 14 वर्ष तक के बच्चों को निःशुल्क एवं अनिवार्य शिक्षा उपलब्ध कराएगा ।
इस संशोधन के पहले भी संविधान के अनुच्छेद 45 के भाग 4 में बच्चों के लिए निःशुल्क एवं अनिवार्य शिक्षा की व्यवस्था थी। नीति निर्देशक सिद्धांत होने के कारण यह न्यायलय में प्रवर्तनीय नहीं था । सर्वव्यापी प्राथमिक शिक्षा उपलब्ध कराने के लिए राज्य बाध्य नहीं था। शिक्षा के अधिकार में कहा गया है कि राज्य बच्चों की शैशव अवस्था में देखभाल एवं सभी बच्चों के लिए शिक्षा की व्यवस्था करेगा। अतः कल्याणकारी राज्य की अवधारणा के लिए इसे मूल अधिकार बना दिया गया है। शिक्षा का मूल अधिकार एक वृहद् दस्तावेज़ है ।
इसके मुख्य प्रावधान इस प्रकार है
·         शिक्षक तथा छात्र अनुपात 1:30 का होगा
·         संविदा शिक्षकों की नियुक्ति नहीं होगी
·         निजी स्कूलों में 25% सीटों पर गरीबी रेखा के नीचे रहने वाले बच्चों को प्रवेश देना होगा ,जिसका खर्च सरकार वहन करेगी
·         शिक्षकों को निजी ट्यूशन पढ़ने की मनाही होगी
·         शिक्षकों को गैर शिक्षण कार्य में नहीं लगाया जाएगा
·         विद्यालयों में उपयुक्त आधारभूत संरचना का विकास होगा
·         बच्चों के अभिभावकों को भी स्कूल प्रबंधन में शामिल किया जाएगा, इसके लिए अभिभावक स्कूल कमेटी की स्थापना की जायेगी
·         पहली से पांचवी कक्षा तक के लिए स्कूल अधिकतम एक किमी तथा 8वीं से10वीं तक अधिकतम 3 किमी की दूरी पर स्थापित होगा
·         केवल योग्य और स्थाई शिक्षकों की ही नियुक्ति होगी
·         शिक्षा पर व्यय को केंद्र और राज्य संयुक्त रूप से वहन करेगा यह 65:35 का होगा
·         इसको कानून की निगरानी में रखने के लिए राष्ट्रीय बुनियादी शिक्षा आयोग का गठन किया जाएगा। इस आयोग के अध्यक्ष की नियुक्ति एक आयोग द्वारा की जाएगी ,जिसमें प्रधानमंत्री ,मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्री ,लोक सभा अध्यक्ष तथा संसद के दोनों सदनों के विपक्ष के नेता भी शामिल होंगे।
क्या है वास्तविकता
निश्चित तौर पर शिक्षा का अधिकार लागू होने के डेढ़ साल बाद 96.6% बच्चे स्कूल जाने लगे हैं। लेकिन अभी भी इस आयु वर्ग के 81 लाख बच्चे इस लाभ से वंचित हैं।सबसे बड़ी समस्या यह है कि जो बच्चे स्कूल जाना शुरू भी करते हैं वो कुछ समय के बाद किसी न किसी कारण से स्कूल छोड़ देते हैं। वहीँ उत्तर प्रदेश, बिहार, राजस्थान इत्यादि राज्यों में लड़कियों के स्कूल जाने की तादाद नगण्य है। एक राष्ट्रीय रिपोर्ट के अनुसार पांचवी कक्षा तक के बच्चे पढ़-लिख नहीं पाते है। बच्चों के स्कूल न जाने के अलग-अलग कारण हैं।सबसे बड़ी समस्या उन बच्चों की है,जिनका काम परिवार में धनोपार्जन करना हैं।
कानून में सिर्फ न्यायोचित गुनवत्ताओं का उल्लेख है ।परन्तु , इसके पैरामीटर तय नहीं किये गए हैं। जिन बुनियादी सुविधाओं की बात की गयी है उसपर अधिकतर स्कूल खरे नहीं उतरते  हैं। अभी देश में लगभग 8 लाख शिक्षकों की आवश्यकता है लेकिन, राज्यों में नियोजन की गति काफी धीमी है देश में 6.7 लाख शिक्षकों के पास एनसीटीए द्वारा तय योग्यता नहीं है ।
शिक्षा का अधिकार के तहत 25% सीटें गरीब बच्चों के लिए आरक्षित थी। लेकिन, देखा गया है कि इन स्कूलों में इन बच्चों को अपमानित किया जाता है । इस कानून में सबसे बड़ी बाधा वित्तीय मामलों को लेकर है। राज्य और केंद्र के बीच में इसी मामले को लेकर विवाद है।
वहीँ दूसरी ओर पिछले कुछ दशकों में प्राइवेट स्कूल काफ़ी तेज़ी से उभर कर आए हैं | ये विद्यालय अलग-अलग स्तरों व आकारों के हैं। इसी तरह उनकी शिक्षा की गुणवत्ता भी अलग-अलग हैं। बहुत कम स्कूल कुलीन व शहरी तबक़ों को ध्यान में रखकर बने हैं। वहीं अधिकतर स्कूल मध्यमवर्ग व निम्न-मध्यमवर्ग के भरोसे चल रहे हैं। इन स्कूलों के शिक्षण-शुल्क सरकारी स्कूलों की तुलना में कहीं अधिक हैं। साथ ही माता-पिता अपने बच्चों को लेकर प्राइवेट स्कूल की ओर ही जाते हैं। इसके पीछे की सोच यह है कि ज्यादा शुल्क चुका कर अपने बच्चों के लिए बेहतर शिक्षा की गारंटी पाना। समाज में इस सोच को व्यापक जगह मिली है और ऐसा लगता है कि बेहतर शिक्षा एक वर्ग-विशेष का मसला बनकर रह गया है।
           इसी तथ्य को भांपते हुए सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पिछले साल कहा था कि हर साल प्राइवेट स्कूल शिक्षण-शुल्क नहीं बढ़ा सकते। उन्हें हर तीन साल पर शुल्क बढ़ाने का निर्देश दिया गया। फिर भी निजी व आवासीय पाठशाला संघ ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश की अवहेलना करते हुए देश भर में प्राइवेट स्कूल के शिक्षण-शुल्क में दस फीसदी की बढ़ोतरी कर दी है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट अपने आदेश के जरिये प्राइवेट व सरकारी स्कूलों के बीच के अंतर को मिटाना चाहता था।
क्या उपाय किये जा सकते हैं       
इन बाधाओं को परस्पर  सामंजस्यता के साथ ही दूर किया जा सकता है । केंद्र और राज्य को प्रभावी ढंग से नीतियों को लागू करने के लिए समूचे कदम उठाने चाहिए । उदाहरण स्वरूप, पढने की कोई उम्र नहीं होती इस बात को ध्यान में रखते हुए मानव संसाधन विकास मंत्रालय ने देश में 300 कम्युनिटी कॉलेज खोलने का निर्णय लिया : ---
·         नये सत्र से खुल रहे कॉलेजों में छोटी अवधि के व्यावसायिक कोर्स चलेंगे
·         किसी भी उम्र या व्यवसाय से जुड़े लोगों को मिलेगी पढ़ाई करने की सुविधा
·         वोकेशनल कोर्स से कुशलता ला सकेंगे लोग
·         शिक्षा को सरकार को सर्वोच्च प्राथमिकता देनी होगी
·         यह देखना जरूरी है कि इस मद में दिया गया पैसा कितना प्रभावकारी तरीके से खर्च किया गया है। साथ ही कितना पैसा इस्तेमाल नहीं हो रहा है
·         ढाँचागत सुविधाओं का विकास करना होगा
·         शिक्षकों की सही योग्यता होनी चाहिए
·         साथ ही इसमें हर उम्र के लोगों को प्राथमिक स्तर तक की शिक्षा अनिवार्य तथा निः शुल्क कर दी जानी चाहिये ।ताकि सब पढ़ें सब बढ़ेंका नारा चरितार्थ हो सके।
                                                                                  
Ranjeeta   Choudhary   

गुरुवार, 14 फ़रवरी 2013

Economic vocabulary start from 'T'


Tangible assets
Assets you can touch: buildings, machinery, gold, works of art, and so on. Contrast with intangible assets.
Tariff
Often used to describe a tax on goods produced abroad imposed by the government of the country to which they are exported. Many countries have reduced such tariffs as part of the process of freeing up world trade.
Tax arbitrage
Creating financial instruments or transactions that allow the parties involved to exploit loopholes in or differences between their tax exposures, so that all involved pay less tax.
Tax avoidance
Doing everything possible within the law to reduce your tax bill. Learned hand, an American judge, once said: “there is nothing sinister in so arranging one’s affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible … nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.” Contrast with tax evasion.
Tax base
The thing or amount to which a tax rate applies. To collect income tax, for example, you need a meaningful definition of income. Definitions of the tax base can vary enormously, over time and among countries, especially when tax breaks are taken into account. As a result, a country with a comparatively high tax rate may not have a high tax burden if it has a more narrowly defined tax base than other countries. In recent years, the political unpopularity of high tax rates has lead many governments to lower rates and at the same time broaden the tax base, often leaving the tax burden unchanged.
Tax burden
Total tax paid in a period as a proportion of total income in that period. It can refer to personal, corporate or national income.
Tax competition
Low-tax policies pursued by some countries in the hope of attracting international businesses and capital. Economists usually favour competition in any form. But some say that tax competition is often a beggar-thy-neighbour policy, which can reduce another country's tax base, or force it to change its mix of taxes, or stop it taxing in the way it would like.
Economists who favour tax competition often cite a 1956 article by Charles tie bout (1924-68) entitled "a pure theory of local expenditures". In it he argued that, faced with a choice of different combinations of tax and government services, taxpayers will choose to locate where they get closest to the mixture they want. Variations in tax rates among different countries are good, because they give taxpayers more choice and thus more chance of being satisfied. This also puts pressure on governments to be efficient. Thus measures to harmonies taxes are a bad idea.
There is at least one big caveat to this theory. Tie bout assumed, crucially, that taxpayers are highly mobile and able to move to wherever their preferred combination of taxes and benefits is on offer. But many taxpayers, including the great majority of workers, are not able to move easily. Tax competition may make it harder to redistribute from rich to poor through the tax system by allowing the rich to move to where taxes are not redistributive.
Tax efficient
From the point of view of the taxpayer, the way of undertaking an economic activity that results in the lowest (legitimate) tax bill.
Tax evasion
Paying less tax than you are legally obliged to. Contrast with tax avoidance. There may be a thin line between the two, but as denies healey, a former British chancellor, once put it, “the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion is the thickness of a prison wall.”
Tax haven
A country or designated zone that has low or no taxes, or highly secretive banks, and often a warm climate and sandy beaches, which make it attractive to foreigners bent on tax avoidance or even tax evasion.
Tax incidence
Where a tax really bites. Who ultimately pays a tax is often different from who the taxman collects the tax from, because the cost of the tax can be passed on. for example, by demanding higher wages if income tax rises, workers can transfer some of the tax burden to their employer's customers or shareholders.
Taxation
Prostitution may be the oldest profession, but tax collection was surely not far behind. In its early days, taxation did not always involve handing over money. The ancient Chinese paid with pressed tea, and jivara tribesmen in brazil stumped up shrunken heads. As the price of their citizenship, ancient Greeks and Romans could be called on to serve as soldiers and had to supply their own weapons. The origins of modern taxation can be traced to wealthy subjects paying money to their king in lieu of military service.
The other early source of tax revenue was trade, with tolls and customs duties being collected from travelling merchants. The big advantage of these taxes was that they fell mostly on visitors rather than residents.
Income tax, the biggest source of government funds today in most countries, is a comparatively recent invention, probably because the notion of annual income is itself a modern concept. Governments preferred to tax things that were easy to measure and on which it was thus easy to calculate the liability. This is why early taxes concentrated on tangible items such as land and property, physical goods, commodities and ships, as well as things such as the number of windows or fireplaces in a building.
In the 20th century, particularly the second half, governments around the world took a growing share of their country's national income in tax, mainly to pay for increasingly more expensive defence efforts and for a modern welfare state. Indirect taxation on consumption, such as value-added tax, has become increasingly important as direct taxation on income and wealth has become increasingly unpopular.
But big differences among countries remain. One is the overall level of tax. For example, in United States tax revenue amounts to around one-third of its GDP, whereas in Sweden it is closer to half. Others are the preferred methods of collecting it (direct versus indirect), the rates at which it is levied and the definition of the tax base to which these rates are applied. Countries have different attitudes to progressive and regressive taxation. There are also big differences in the way responsibility for taxation is divided among different levels of government.
Arguably, any tax is a bad tax. But public goods and other government activities have to be paid for somehow, and economists often have strong views on which methods of taxation are more or less efficient. Most economists agree that the best tax is one that has as little impact as possible on people's decisions about whether to undertake a productive economic activity. High rates of tax on labour may discourage people from working, and so result in lower tax revenue than there would be if the tax rate were lower, an idea captured in the Laffer curve. Certainly, the marginal rate of tax may have a bigger effect on incentives than the overall tax burden.
Land tax is regarded as the most efficient by some economists and tax on expenditure by others, as it does all the taking after the wealth creation is done.
Some economists favour a neutral tax system that does not influence the sorts of economic activities that take place. Others favour using tax, and tax breaks, to guide economic activity in ways they favour, such as to minimize pollution and to increase the attractiveness of employing people rather than capital. Some economists argue that the tax system should be characterized by both horizontal equity and vertical equity, because this is fair, and because when the tax system is fair people may find it harder to justify tax avoidance and tax evasion. However, who ultimately pays (the tax incidence) may be different from who is initially charged, if that person can pass it on, say by adding the tax to the price he charges for his output. Taxes on companies, for example, are always paid in the end by humans, be they workers, customers or shareholders.
Technical progress
A crucial ingredient of economic growth. Economists often used to take a certain rate of technological progress for granted, but in new endogenous growth theory they make more effort to measure accurately and better understand what causes differences in the rate of technical change.
Terms of trade
The weighted average of a country's export prices relative to its import prices.
Third way
An economic philosophy espoused by some leftish political leaders in the late 20th century, including Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. According to the rhetoric, it is not capitalism and not socialism, but a third (pragmatic) way. Many have therefore found it rather hard to pin down. It was earlier used to describe Sweden’s economic model.
Tick
The minimum price change possible in a financial marketplace.
Tiger economies
The fast-growing developing economies of Asia, at least before their crisis in the late 1990s.
Time series
Several measurements of a variable taken at regular intervals, such as daily, monthly, quarterly, and so on. They are often used by economists in search of trends that they hope will let them predict future movements in the variable.
Time value of money
The idea that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in the future, because the dollar in the hand today can earn interest during the time until the future dollar is received.
Tobin, James
A Nobel prize-winning economist, James Tobin (1918-2002) theorized that firms would continue to invest as long as the value of their shares exceeded the replacement cost of their assets. The ratio of the market value of a firm to the net replacement cost of the firm's assets is known as 'Tobin’s q'. If q is greater than 1, then it should pay the firm to expand, as the profit it should expect to make from its assets (reflected in the share price) exceeds the cost of the assets. If q is less than 1, the firm would be better off selling its assets, which are worth more than shareholders currently expect the firm to earn in profit by retaining them.
Tobin also gave his name to the 'Tobin tax', a (so far unimplemented) proposal to reduce speculative cross-border flows of capital by levying a small tax on foreign exchange transactions.
Total return
The sum of all the different benefits from investing in an asset, including income paid to the investor and any change in the market value of the asset. The total return is often expressed as a percentage of the amount invested.
Trade area
In a globalizing economy, it is perhaps surprising that countries increasingly trade with their nearest neighbours. One explanation is geography: as countries have lowered their tariff barriers, the relatively greater importance of transport costs makes proximity matter more. According to new trade theory, this also produces gains from economies of scale. But another reason for the fast growth in trade among nearby countries may be less benign. The proliferation of regional trade agreements may be causing neighbours to trade with each other when it would be more efficient for them to export to and import from afar.
In the past 50 years more than 150 regional trade agreements have been notified to the general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT) or the world trade organization (WTO), most of which are still in force. Roughly half of these, including some revisions of previous deals, have been set up since 1990. The best-known are the European Union, the North American free-trade agreement (NAFTA) and Mercosur in South America. There are dozens of other examples.
Economists have generally been unenthusiastic about regionalism, for two reasons. First, they worry that preferential tariffs will cause trade to flow in inefficient ways, a process known as trade diversion. In a perfect world, trade patterns should be determined by comparative advantage: the comparative cost of making different goods yourself as opposed to buying them from various countries. If the United States imports Mexican televisions merely because the Mexican goods are tariff-free, even if Malaysia has a comparative advantage in television manufacturing, the main benefit of trade will be lost.
The second concern is that regionalism will impede efforts to liberalise trade throughout the world. One prominent critic, Jagdish Bhagwati, an economist at Columbia University in New York, has famously said that regional trade areas are 'stumbling blocks' rather than 'building blocks' in the freeing of global trade. There is no clear-cut theoretical answer to the question of whether regional trade agreements are good or bad, and the empirical findings are hotly disputed. In general, though, it seems likely that it is better to have regional groups that are open to the rest of the world than groups that are closed.
Trade deficit/surplus
An excess of imports over exports is a trade deficit. An excess of exports over imports is a trade surplus.
Trade-weighted exchange rate
A country’s exchange rate with the currencies of its trading partners weighted by the amount of trade done by the country in each currency.
Tragedy of the commons
A 19th-century amateur mathematician, William Forster Lloyd, modeled the fate of a common pasture shared among rational, utility-maximizing herdsmen. He showed that as the population increased the pasture would inevitably be destroyed. This tragedy may be the fate of all sorts of common resources, because no individual, firm or group has meaningful property rights that would make them think twice about using so much of it that it is destroyed.
Once a resource is being used at a rate near its sustainable capacity, any additional use will reduce its value to its current users. Thus they will increase their usage to maintain the value of the resource to them, resulting in a further deterioration in its value, and so on, until no value remains. Contemporary examples include overfishing and the polluting of the atmosphere. Transaction costs
The costs incurred during the process of buying or selling, on top of the PRICE of whatever is changing hands. If these costs can be reduced, the PRICE MECHANISM will operate more efficiently.
Transfer pricing
The prices assumed, for the purposes of calculating tax liability, to have been charged by one unit of a multinational company when selling to another (foreign) unit of the same firm. Firms spend a fortune on advisers to help them set their transfer prices so that they minimise their total tax bill. For instance, by charging low transfer prices from a unit based in a high-tax country that is selling to a unit in a low-tax country, a firm can record a low profit in the first country and a high profit in the second. In theory, however, transfer prices are supposed to be set according to the arm's-length principle: that they should be the same as would be charged if the sale was to a business unconnected in any way to the selling firm. But when there is no genuinely independent market with which to compare transfer prices, what an arm's length price would be can be a matter of great debate and an opportunity for firms that want to lower their tax bill.
Transfers
Payments that are made without any good or service being received in return. Much public spending goes on transfers, such as pensions and welfare benefits. Private-sector transfers include charitable donations and prizes to lottery winners.
Transition economies
Former communist economies that, with varying degrees of enthusiasm, have embraced capitalism.
Transmission mechanism
The process by which changes in the money supply affect the level of total demand in an economy.
Transparency
A buzz word for the idea that the more information is disclosed about an economic activity the better. Many regulators, private lenders, politicians and economists reckoned that the Asian economic crisis of the late 1990s would not have been so severe, or even have happened, had Asian governments, banks and other companies made available more and better data about their financial condition. Likewise, the collapse of Enron provoked demands for greater transparency, to help improve corporate governance in the united states and other industrialised countries. Some economists reckon that transparency is one of the most effective methods of regulation. Rather than risk regulatory capture, why not simply maximise disclosure and leave it to the market to decide whether what the information reveals is acceptable?
Treasury bills
A form of short-term government debt. Treasury bills usually mature after three months. They are used for managing fluctuations in the government’s short-run cash needs. Most government borrowing takes the form of longer-term bonds.
Trough
The transition point between economic recession and recovery.
Trust
One of the most valuable economic assets, hard to create but easy to destroy - a crucial ingredient of a country's social capital. People are more likely to do business together when they trust each other. Trust can reduce market failure that otherwise results from asymmetric information. When there is a lack of trust, people may have to spend heavily on monitoring others' behaviour to ensure they do what they say they will do. This cost may be so high that it is not worth going ahead with a business deal. When trust is absent, people may be less flexible in their dealings with each other. Countries can overcome some of the problems of a lack of trust by passing laws requiring good behaviour, but only to the extent that people trust that the laws will be enforced. One way in which companies seek to demonstrate that they can trust is by investing heavily in a brand.

कुल पेज दृश्य