रविवार, 28 अप्रैल 2013

SABLA scheme



 

The world is home to 1.2 billion individuals aged 10-19 years generally known as the phase of ‘Adolescence’.Adolescence is a phase during which major physical and psychological changes take place in children, along with changes in their social perceptions and expectations. Adolescence is also the stage when young people extend their relationships beyond parents and family and are intensely influenced by their peers and the outside world. They are also the years of experimentation and risk taking, of giving in to negative peer pressure, of taking uninformed decisions on crucial issues, The vast majority of adolescents live in developing countries and India has the largest national population of adolescents. Studies show that millions of adolescents today do not enjoy access to quality education, basic sexual and reproductive health care, support for mental health issues and disability, protection from violence, abuse and exploitation, and forums for active participation.

Gender-gap in the World of Adolescents
Women constitute nearly half of the population  of the country, but gender disparities in socio-cultural spheres have adversely affected a balanced equitable development. These disparities get reflected in important social development indicators such as health, nutrition, literacy, educational attainments, skill levels, occupational status etc. The same  is also reflected in the situation of  Adolescent girl.
The Adolescent girls in the 10–19 years constitute almost 47 per cent of the total population of Adolescents in the country. But  their development is fraught with varied problems. Almost 50% of women marry  before the legal age of 18 verses 10% of young men. Overall, one in six women in age group of 15-19 have begun childbearing. Early childbearing is most common in rural areas and among women with no education. Around 41% of all maternal deaths take place among those aged 15-24. 56% adolescent girls are anemic (verses 30% adolescent boys). Anemic adolescent mothers are at a higher risk of miscarriages, maternal mortality and still-births and low-weight babies. The drop-out rates among the girls are quite high. 21% adolescent girls and 8% adolescent boys have no education. Dropout rates among girls are high largely due to distance from schools, male teachers, sanitation facilities at school, early marriage and early assumption of domestic responsibilities etc.
While the world expands for boys giving them greater freedom of choice and opportunities, it contracts for girls and, more so when they are from groups, sections having biases and practicing discrimination against girls. The Adolescent Girls (AGs) are shy and find it hard to come out openly and share their problems and issues with parents, teachers, doctors, etc. As a result, they either grow without resolution of the issues or get misguided, being driven by their own perceptions.
Adolescent Girls are a core resource for national growth. Investment in their health and development is investment in the greater well-being of the country. Considering that several of these girls are out of school, get married early, face discrimination in accessing health, education and other services, work in vulnerable situation, and are influenced by peer pressure, they need special attention. The public health challenges for adolescents, which include pregnancy, risk of maternal and infant mortality, sexually transmitted diseases, reproductive tract infections, rapidly rising incidence of HIV, etc., require influencing the health-seeking behavior of AGs. They need to be looked at in terms of their needs both as a group as well as individuals as they are the productive members of the society in future. Recognizing the unmet needs of AGs, Rajiv Gandhi Scheme for Empowerment of Adolescent Girls – Sabla has been launched  as a comprehensive intervention for Adolescent girls in the age-group of 11-18, with a focus on  out of school girls. To begin with, the Scheme is being implemented in 200 districts of the country on a pilot basis.

Key Areas of Sabla Scheme
Using the ICDS platform, this scheme is reaching out to nearly 1crore adolescent girls between 11 – 18 years of age in 200 districts across the country with an integrated package of services. Sabla aims at all-round development of adolescent girls of 11-18 years (with a focus on all out-of-school AGs) by making them ‘self reliant’. At the AnganwadiCenter, supplementary nutrition providing 600 Kcal and 18-20 g of protein and micronutrients is provided every day at the anganwadi centers either as hot cooked meal or as take home rations  to out of school adolescent girls in 11-14 years and all girls between 14-18 years for 300 days in a year.
In addition, out of school adolescent girls are being provided non- nutrition services which include life skills education, supervised weekly IFA (100 mg of elemental iron and 0.5 mg of folic acid) supplementation and nutrition counselling, sexual and reproductive health education and counseling, skills in leadership, problem solving, decision making and accessing public services. In addition, older adolescent girls (16 - 18 year olds) are being given vocational training to make them self reliant. The Scheme also emphasizes convergence of services under various programmes such as Health, Education, Youth affairs and Sports, and Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI) to achieve the programme objectives.
With the support of community-based frontline workers (anganwadi workers) and civil society groups, adolescent girls have been organized in groups called Kishori Samoohs. Each Samooh is led by a peer leader (Kishori Sakhi) and meet at least 5-6 hours a week to receive programme services and function as a peer support group. Every girl enrolled in Sabla are given a Kishori Card, an entitlement tool to monitor girls’ access to and uptake of the services under SablaThe non-nutrition services under the Sabla programme interventions also reach out to the non-school going adolescent girls through adolescent groups i.e., Kishori Samoohs meetings. Each adolescent group comprises of 15 – 25 adolescent girls led by peer leaders i.e., Kishori Sakhi and their two associates i.e., Sahelis. The Sakhis and Sahelis are imparted training and serve as a peer monitor/educator for adolescent girls. They serve the group for one year and each girl will have a term of four months as a Sakhi on rotational basis. The AGs also participate in day to day activities of AWC like Pre School, Education, growth monitoring and SNP and facilitate the AWW in other activities. They also accompany the AWW for home visits (2-3 girls at a time) which serves as a training ground for future.  
State-Specific Initiatives of Sabla
In many states like Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, NGOs are being utilised for all awareness generation activities and training of the Sakhis and Sahelis. Once a week, interactions of the school going and the non-school going adolescents is also organised so that interactions of the school and non school going adolescents are enhanced and the latter is motivated to join school. Once in three months on a fixed day i.e., on Kishori Diwas, general health checkups including measurement of height and weight and referral services are organised for all the adolescent girls by the Anganwadi worker with help from the health functionaries and referrals to specialised health care facilities for health problems that need special attention. Each adolescent girl is provided a Kishori Card which is a tool to monitor the services the adolescent girl utilises under the Sabla scheme.
With the basic framework of the scheme, State governments have undertaken special initiatives to reach out for the well being of adolescent girls. In Bihar, the state government has clubbed the vocational training of the adolescent girls 16 – 18 years and is reaching out to them through the Hunar scheme of the Education department, a special state level initiative to empower the minorities, schedule castes and scheduled tribes. Under this arrangement efforts are made to provide commercially viable training and develop employable skills among youth who have atleast passed the 8th class.
In states like Orissa, the state government has prioritized training the girls in textile craft and has tied up the vocational training with the existing cottage industries and market linked the trainings so that the older girls can be economically independent. Similar efforts are also being undertaken by the state governments of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.
In Gujarat, the state government has rolled out the Mamta-Taruni programme to ensure adequate healthcare and timely counseling to adolescent girls. The programme is aimed at providing healthcare to girls who are out of school, because there already exists a health programme especially for school students. Through this programme the young girls are also given physical and psychological counseling for the changes taking place in the body during adolescence.Every six months, the nutritional status and hemoglobin levels of the girl are achieved and they are given treatment for anemia if needed. To ensure maximum participation in the programme, the state government has introduced a small monetary provision. The idea is to ensure that maximum number of girls, especially in rural areas, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes participate in the programme. The state also gives the 'peer educator' i.e. Sakhis a small token amount of Rs 25 for every meeting so that they bring as many girls to the kishori samooh meeting as possible, and make them aware. At the same time, the Anganwadi worker is also given an incentive of Rs. 50 for calling the meeting and counseling the girls.
In Jharkhand, the state government has taken a special initiative to establish effective linkages for vocational training in order to build the technical and professional skills of adolescent girls. Linkages for the vocational training and placements have been established with the NSDC (National Skill Development Corporation) and 30 local non-government partners. The adolescent girls groups are also being linked to the existing self-help groups so that interactions with these groups can help in their economic self-reliance. The state government in collaboration with the Department of Education is in the process of designing a special curriculum to mainstream the out of school adolescent girls into the school system through specially designed educational courses that cater to their literary needs. The state government is undertaking steps to link every adolescent girl under 18 with the formal school setup; for which linkages with National Programme of Education of Girls (NPEGEL) and KGBV (Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya) scheme have been established. Child trafficking especially that of tribal girls is a major problem faced by the state. In order to address this problem, the state government of Jharkhand, through the life skills education, appropriate vocational training and enhancing literacy levels in the state, hopes that the incidence of child trafficking is reduced. In addition, under the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), funds are being utilized for creating small library and learning centre in every AWC. The state has also started a statewide social mobilization Campaign for Health and Nutrition for adolescent girls, which was inaugurated by Health minister of the state in a function where all interventions under Sabla were initiated.
Sabla endeavors to have AGs with enhanced self esteem, improved nutrition and health status with enhanced skills and the capacity to make informed choices. Through various schemes including, Sabla, the government is investing in the health, nutrition and development needs of adolescent girls to advance their rights to education, health and protection which will help to them to build a future of gender equality and justice.  All this, will in turn help  in building of a self-reliant and confident women citizenry.



शनिवार, 27 अप्रैल 2013

चर्चित व्यक्ति (जनवरी – मार्च) 2013


अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय

परवेज मुशर्रफ- पाकिस्तान के पूर्व राष्ट्रपति परवेज मुशर्रफ 4 वर्ष के स्वनिर्वासन के बाद 24 मार्च 2013 को दुबई से कराची (पाकिस्तान) वापस लौटे. तालिबान की हत्या की धमकियों के बावजूद मुशर्रफ 11 मई 2013 से शुरू होने वाले आम चुनाव में भाग लेने के लिए पाकिस्तान पहुंचे हैं.

नजीब मिकाटी- लेबनान के प्रधानमंत्री नजीब मिकाटी ने अपनी सरकार का इस्तीफा राष्ट्रपति माइकल सुलेमान को 22 मार्च 3012 को सौंप दिया. उन्होंने यह इस्तीफा आगामी संसदीय चुनावों की तैयारी और लेबनॅन के पुलिस प्रमुख मेजर जनरल अशरफ रिफी का कार्यकाल बढ़ाने से इंकार पर मतभेदों के कारण दिया. पुलिस प्रमुख मेजर जनरल अशरफ रिफी का कार्यकाल अप्रैल 2013 तक है. लेबनान में संसदीय चुनाव जून 2013 तक होने हैं. 

रानी रामास्वामी- अमेरिकी राष्ट्रपति बराक ओबामा ने भरतनाट्यम की नृत्यांगना एवं भारतीय मूल की अमेरिकी नागरिक रानी रामास्वामी को राष्ट्रीय कला परिषद में पांच वर्ष के कार्यकाल के लिए 21 मार्च 2013 को नामित किया. रानी रामास्वामी ने वर्ष 1992 में मिनिसोटा के मिनिपोलिस में रागमाला म्यूजिक एंड डांस थियेटर खोला था. वह अमेरिका में भारतीय शास्त्रीय नृत्य को बढ़ावा दे रही हैं. 

राजा कृष्णामूर्ति- भारतीय मूल के अमेरिकी राजनीतिज्ञ राजा कृष्णामूर्ति को इलिनॉयस इनोवेशन काउंसिल का उपाध्यक्ष नियुक्त किया गया. राजा कृष्णामूर्ति की नियुक्ति गर्वनर पैट क्विन ने की. यह जानकारी 18 मार्च 2013 को प्राप्त हुई. 

खिल राज रेगमी- नेपाल के प्रधान न्यायाधीश खिल राज रेगमी को नेपाल की अंतरिम सरकार के प्रधानमंत्री के रूप में 14 मार्च 2013 को शपथ दिलाई गई. खिल राज रेगमी ने पूर्व प्रधानमंत्री बाबूराम भट्टराई का स्थान लिया. राष्ट्रपति रामबरन यादव ने राष्ट्रपति भवन में आयोजित एक समारोह में खिल राज रेगमी को पद एवं गोपनीयता की शपथ दिलाई. अंतरिम सरकार द्वारा 21 जून 2013 तक चुनाव कराए जाने हैं.

शी जिनपिंग- शी जिनपिंग ने चीन के राष्ट्रपति और सेनाध्यक्ष का पद 14 मार्च 2013 को ग्रहण किया. शी जिनपिंग ने हू जिन्ताओ का स्थान लिया. इस तरह दुनिया के सबसे ज्यादा आबादी वाले देश चीन में सत्ता हस्तांतरण की प्रक्रिया पूरी हो गई.  ग्रेट हाल ऑफ द पीपुल में चल रही चीन की संसद ने सत्तारूढ़ कम्युनिस्ट पार्टी ऑफ चीन (सीपीसी) का अध्यक्ष पद संभालने के 4 महीने बाद 59 वर्षीय शी जिनपिंग को विधिवत राष्ट्रपति निर्वाचित किया.

डॉक्टर विस्ताप एम कारभारी- भारतीय मूल के अमेरिकी नागरिक डॉक्टर विस्ताप एम कारभारी को आर्लिग्टन स्थित प्रतिष्ठित यूनिवर्सिटी ऑफ टेक्सास का अध्यक्ष नियुक्त किया गया.

जॉर्ज मारियो बर्गोगलियो- अर्जेन्टीना के जॉर्ज मारियो बर्गोगलियो  को रोमन कैथोलिक चर्च का 266वां पोप वैटिकन सिटी में 13 मार्च 2013 को निर्वाचित किया गया. जॉर्ज मारियो बर्गोगलियो ने अपना नाम पोप फ्रांसिस प्रथम रखा. पोप चुने जाने से पहले वह अर्जेन्टीना के कार्डिनल थे. पोप के चुनाव में 115 कार्डिनल ने भाग लिया. भारत से भी 5 कार्डिनल इस प्रक्रिया में शामिल थे. पोप के रूप में चयन किए जाने के बाद सबसे पहले उन्होंने ऐतिहासिक सेंट पीटर्स बैसिलिका की बालकनी में आकर वहां मौजूद लोगों को संबोधित किया.

जॉन केरी- जॉन केरी ने अमेरिका के विदेशमंत्री पद की शपथ 1 फरवरी 2013 को ली. जॉन केरी ने हिलेरी क्लिंटन का स्थान लिया. वह अमेरिका के 68वें विदेशमंत्री हैं. जॉन केरी (69) को अमेरिका के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की न्यायाधीश इलेना कागन ने शपथ दिलाई.

पार्क ग्यून हे- कंजरवेटिव पार्टी की पार्क ग्यून हे ने दक्षिण कोरिया के राष्ट्रपति के पद की शपथ 25 फरवरी 2013 को ली. इस शपथ के साथ ही वह देश की पहली महिला राष्ट्रपति बन गईं. 61 वर्षीया पार्क ग्यून हे ने दिसंबर 2012 में हुए चुनावों में लिबरल पार्टी के मून जे-इन को पराजित किया था.

ऑस्कर पिस्टोरियस- पुलिस ने दक्षिण अफ्रीका के पैरालंपिक स्वर्ण पदक विजेता ब्लेड रनर ऑस्कर पिस्टोरियस पर रीवा स्टीनकेंप (ऑस्कर पिस्टोरियस की प्रेमिका) की हत्या का आरोप 14 फरवरी 2013 को लगाया. ऑस्कर पिस्टोरियस के प्रिटोरिया स्थित आवास पर गोलीबारी के बाद उन्हें गिरफ्तार किया गया.

मुहम्मद नशीद- मालदीव के पूर्व राष्ट्रपति और मालदीव डेमोक्रेटिक पार्टी के नेता मुहम्मद नशीद ने माले स्थित भारतीय उच्चायोग में 13 फरवरी 2013 को शरण ली. मालदीव के न्यायालय ने 13 फरवरी 2013 को मुहम्मद नशीद की गिरफ्तारी का वारंट जारी किया था. इससे पहले मुहम्मद नशीद ने गिरफ्तारी पर रोक हेतु न्यायालय में याचिका दायर की थी, लेकिन उसे खारिज कर दिया गया.

पोप बेनेडिक्ट 16- कैथोलिक चर्च के प्रमुख पोप बेनेडिक्ट 16वें ने अपने पद से 11 फरवरी 2013 को इस्तीफा देने का निर्णय किया. 85 वर्षीय पोप ने अपनी उम्र को इस्तीफे का कारण बताया. 600 वर्षों में यह पहला मौका है जब किसी पोप ने अपने पद से इस्तीफा दिया है. पोप बेनेडिक्ट 16वें द्वारा 28 फरवरी 2013 को इस्तीफा दिया जाना है. यह पद उन्हें 19 अप्रैल 2005 को कार्डिनलों द्वारा सौंपा गया था. इसके साथ ही उन्होंने कार्डिनलों से नए पोप का चुनाव करने का आग्रह किया.

डेविड कोलमैन हेडली- वर्ष 2008 में हुए मुंबई आतंकी हमले की साजिश में शामिल रहे लश्कर-ए-तैयबा के संदिग्ध सदस्य डेविड कोलमैन हेडली को शिकागो के जिला न्यायालय ने 24 जनवरी 2013 को 35 वर्ष जेल की सजा सुनाई. अमेरिकी सरकार ने डेविड कोलमैन हेडली के लिए इतनी ही सजा की मांग की थी. जांच में सहयोग के चलते वह उम्रकैद और मौत की सजा से बच गया.

श्रीकांत श्रीनिवासन- अमेरिका के राष्ट्रपति बराक ओबामा ने भारतीय मूल के अमेरिकी नागरिक श्रीकांत श्रीनिवासन सहित 33 संघीय न्यायाधीशों को अमेरिका की अपीलीय न्यायालय में फिर से नामित किया. श्रीकांत श्रीनिवासन डिस्टि्रक ऑफ कोलंबिया सर्किट की अपीलीय न्यायालय के लिए पुनर्नामांकित होने वाले एकमात्र भारतीय मूल के अमेरिकी नागरिक हैं. श्रीकांत श्रीनिवासन का नामांकन 4 जनवरी 2013 को किया गया.

जॉन ड्रामनी महामा- नेशनल डेमोक्रेटिक कांग्रेस  के नेता जॉन ड्रामनी महामा दूसरे कार्यकाल के लिए पश्चिमी अफ्रीका के देश घाना के राष्ट्रपति निर्वाचित हुए. घाना के निर्वाचन आयोग ने चुनाव के परिणाम की घोषणा 9 दिसंबर 2012  को की. निर्वाचन आयोग के अनुसार जॉन ड्रामनी महामा को 50.7 प्रतिशत, जबकि उनके प्रतिद्वंदी न्यू पैट्रियोटिक पार्टी  के नेता अकूफो-आदो को 47.74 प्रतिशत मत मिले. चुनाव में बायोमैट्रिक पद्धति का प्रयोग किया गया. विपक्ष ने सरकार पर चुनावों में धांधली करने का आरोप लगाया.

राष्ट्रीय

प्रो. निबिर मंडल- प्रो. निबिर मंडल को वर्ष 2012 के वैज्ञानिक अनुसंधान के लिए घनश्यामदास बिड़ला पुरस्कार के लिए चुना गया. क्रम में यह 22वां है. प्रो. निबिर मंडल जाधवपुर विश्वविद्यालय के भूगर्भ विज्ञान विभाग में प्रोफेसर के पद पर कार्यरत हैं.  प्रो. निबिर मंडल को यह सम्मान संरचनात्मक भूविज्ञान एवं विवर्तनिकी के क्षेत्र में उनके महत्त्वपूर्ण योगदान के लिए प्रदान किया जाना है. प्रो. निबिर मंडल एक भू-वैज्ञानिक हैं. 

संजय दत्त- सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने मुंबई में वर्ष 1993 में हुए श्रृंखलाबद्ध बम धमाकों के मामले में फिल्म अभिनेता संजय दत्त को अवैध हथियार रखने के जुर्म में 5 वर्ष कठोर कारावास की सजा सुनाई है. यह निर्णय सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ति पी सतशिवम व न्यायमूर्ति बीएस चौहान की पीठ ने 21 मार्च 2013 को दिया. इससे पहले टाडा (आतंकवादी और विघटनकारी गतिविधियां (रोकथाम) अधिनियम) न्यायालय ने संजय दत्त को गैरकानूनी तरीके से नौ एमएम की पिस्तौल और एके 56 राइफल रखने के जुर्म में नवंबर 2006 में दोषी ठहराते हुए छह वर्ष कठोर कैद की सजा सुनाई थी.

अफजल गुरु- भारतीय संसद पर 13 दिसंबर 2001 को हुए हमले के लिए दोषी अफजल गुरु को दिल्ली के तिहाड़ जेल में 9 फरवरी 2013 को सुबह 8 बजे फांसी दे दी गई. उसे जेल में ही दफना दिया गया. केंद्रीय गृहमंत्री सुशील कुमार शिंदे ने अफजल गुरु को फांसी दिए जाने की पुष्टि की. अफजल गुरु को तिहाड़ जेल में जेल नंबर तीन में उच्च सुरक्षा (हाई सिक्युरिटी) वार्ड में रखा गया था.

राहुल गांधी- राजस्थान की राजधानी जयपुर में कांग्रेस के चिंतन शिविर के दूसरे दिन 19 जनवरी 2013 को कांग्रेस पार्टी के महासचिव राहुल गांधी को पार्टी का उपाध्यक्ष नियुक्त किया गया. कांग्रेस कार्यसमिति की बैठक शुरू होते ही कांग्रेस के वरिष्ठ नेता और केंद्रीय रक्षा मंत्री एके एंटनी ने राहुल गांधी को पार्टी का उपाध्यक्ष बनाने का प्रस्ताव रखा जिसे अध्यक्ष सोनिया गांधी ने अपनी मंजूरी दे दी.

कमलनाथ- भारत के प्रधानमंत्री मनमोहन सिंह ने केंद्रीय कैबिनेट मंत्री (शहरी विकास और संसदीय कार्य) कमलनाथ का विश्व आर्थिक फोरम 2013 हेतु भारतीय प्रतिनिधिमंडल के नेता के रूप में चयन किया. विश्व आर्थिक फोरम 2013 का आयोजन 23 जनवरी 2013 से 27 जनवरी 2013 तक स्विट्जरलैंड के दावोस में किया जाना है.

पीए संगमा- पूर्व लोकसभा अध्यक्ष व वर्ष 2012 के राष्ट्रपति चुनाव में प्रत्याशी पीए संगमा (पूर्णो अगातो संगमा,  ने नेशनल पीपुल्स पार्टी (एनपीपी) का गठन 5 जनवरी 2013 को किया. नेशनल पीपुल्स पार्टी (एनपीपी) बनाने के साथ ही वह राष्ट्रीय प्रजातांत्रिक गंठबंधन (एनडीए) में शामिल हो गए. एनपीपी देश के आदिवासी बहुल राज्यों-आंध्र प्रदेश, महाराष्ट्र, मध्य प्रदेश, झारखंड, छत्तीसगढ़, ओडिशा, राजस्थान, गुजरात के अलावा पूर्वोत्तर राज्यों पर विशेष ध्यान देगी. पीए संगमा ने एनपीपी का चुनाव चिह्न किताब रखने का निर्णय लिया है.

सनमीत कौर साहनी- सनमीत कौर साहनी ने कौन बनेगा करोड़पति-6 (केबीसी) में पांच करोड़ रुपए 5 जनवरी 2013 जीत लिया. इसी जीत के साथ वह टीवी गेम शो कौन बनेगा करोड़पति में पांच करोड़ रुपए वाली पहली महिला बन गई. 37 वर्षीय सुरमीत कौर साहनी ने पांच करोड़ रुपए के प्रश्न का सही उत्तर दिया और इस गेम शो के इतिहास में इतनी बड़ी धनराशि जीतने वाली दूसरी प्रतिभागी बन गई.

अर्चना दत्ता-  अर्चना दत्ता ने आकाशवाणी के समाचार सेवा प्रभाग में महानिदेशक-समाचार का कार्यभार 31 दिसंबर 2012 को ग्रहण किया. उन्होंने जी मोहन्ती का स्थान लिया. जी मोहन्ती को विज्ञापन और दृश्य प्रचार निदेशालय में महानिदेशक के पद पर स्थानांतरित किया गया. 

श्रीनिवास अयंगर रामानुजन- सर्चइंजन गूगल का पृष्ठ 22 दिसंबर 2012 को भारतीय गणितज्ञ श्रीनिवास अयंगर रामानुजन को समर्पित रहा. श्रीनिवास अयंगर रामानुजन की 125वीं जयंती पर गूगल ने ओपन पेज पर पाई समेत उनकी कई प्रमेय को कैरीकेचर के माध्यम से दर्शाया. भारत सरकार द्वारा वर्ष 2012 को गणित वर्ष तथा श्रीनिवास अयंगर रामानुजन का जन्मदिवस 22 दिसंबर गणित दिवस घोषित किया गया.

PERSON IN NEWS (November 2012 to March 2013)


INTERNATIONAL
Malala Yousafzai- Malala Yousafzai, the 15 years old Pakistani schoolgirl who was shot in the head by Taliban in October 2012 for advocating girls’ education, signed a deal for around 3 million dollars in March 2013 to publish her memoir. 
The Book which is titled I am Malala is supposed to Publish later in this year.
Pervez Musharraf- The former President of Pakistan, Gen. Pervez Musharraf returned back to Pakistan on 24 March 2013, ending four years self-imposed exile. He declared that he was going back for the political future of Pakistan, despite threats from Pakistani Taliban. He came back to Karachi from Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Bobby Ghosh -Bobby Ghosh, the eminent Indian Journalist was appointed as the editor of Time International on 16 March 2013. He is the first non-American World Editor in the history of the Times. His appointment to the post was confirmed by the editor in Chief, Martha Nelson and Managing Editor Rick Stengel in a joint email.
Haruhiko Kuroda- The Government of Japan in the last week of February 2013, nominated Haruhiko Kuroda for the designation of next governor of the Central Bank of the country, the Bank of Japan. At present, Haruhiko Kuroda is the head of Asian Development Bank.
Oscar Pistorius- Oscar Pistorius, the double amputee Blade Runner from South Africa was charged on 14 February 2013 for allegedly shooting dead his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, at his home in Pretoria. 
Giuseppe Orsi- Giuseppe Orsi, head of an Italian defence and aerospace giant Finmeccanica was arrested in Milan on 11 February 2013 on the charges of his alleged involvement in the bribery activity to secure an Indian defence helicopter deal of 3600 crore rupees. He was arrested in relation to the probe of the international corruption.
Joseph Dunford- US Marine General Joseph Dunford took over the command of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan at a change over ceremony in Kabul on 10 February 2013. He succeeded US Marine General John Allen who became the longest-serving ISAF commander in the eleven year old war against terror in Afghanistan by completing 19 months at the office. General Dunford previously served in various capacities in the U.S. Marine Corps including as its Assistant Commandant.
Annette Schavan- Annette Schavan the Education Minister of Germany on 6 February 2013 was stripped of her doctorate degree by the committee of academics at Duesseldorf’s Heinrich Heine University. The University took the action after the committee considered the allegations of plagiarism done by Schavan in different parts of the thesis submitted to the University. 
David Coleman Headley- David Coleman Headley, the Pakistani-American and the mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attack 2008 was sentenced to 35 years in Prison on 24 January 2013 by a U.S. Court. The Court sentence would be followed by a five years of supervised release. It was admitted by the U.S. Government that the nature of role played by Headley in 26/11 attacks were deplorable and the prosecution pressed for a sentence of 30 to 35 years for him.
Tahawwur Rana- Tahawwur Rana, the Chicago based businessman and immigration consultant was sentenced for 14 years in Jail by the Federal Judge of US. He was sentenced by the court for his alleged involvement in supporting the terrorist group from Pakistan, which worked with the intelligence service of Pakistan and carried out the 26/11 Mumbai Attacks in 2008.
Tahir-ul Qadri- Tahir-ul Qadri, the Canada-returned cleric led thousands of the protestors in Pakistan and rallied in Islamabad for the third consecutive day on 16 January 2013. Qadri asked the government to quit as well as dissolve the provincial and national assemblies on 16 January 2013. The demand is electoral reforms, among others.
Halimah Yacob- Halimah Yacob  became the first woman and the 9th Speaker of the Singapore Parliament on 14 January 2013. She replaced Michael Palmer, the former People's Action Party MP. Palmer got down from the post of Speaker of the Parliament and as an MP on 12 December 2012. Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong nominated her for the designation of speaker. 
Jiroemon Kimura- Jiroemon Kimura (115 years) became the world’s oldest person after the death of his predecessor, an American woman named Dina Manfredini who died two weeks after receiving the title of oldest person of the world. 
Ami Bera- Ami Bera, California-based, Indian-American has become the only 3rd of the community to win Congressional election, making it to US House of Representatives on 6 November, 2012 by defeating Republican Dan Lungren. Bera at present is in Washington for the orientation course that is organized for the new lawmakers. This is incidentally led by the opponent Lungren.
Barack Obama-  President Barack Obama won re-election on 6 November 2012 overthrowing a severe challenge from Republican Mitt Romney resisting concerns over his handling of economy and anxiety over the future. He was re-elected for a second term in the White House securing another four years in which he will try to fulfil the promise that greeted his election in 2008. Barack Obama is the America's first black president who had won the election by convincing voters to stick with him as he tries to reignite strong economic growth and recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s.


 NATIONAL
Abu Jundal- National Investigation Agency (NIA) on 4 April 2013 charge sheet against Sayed Zabiuddin Ansari alias Abu Jundal, the suspected terrorist of the banned Lashker-e-taiba (Let) and the mastermind of Mumbai Terror Attacks in the designated court in Patiala house in New Delhi. 
Nikhil Kumar- Nikhil Kumar, former Nagaland Governor on 23 March 2013 sworn in as the 20th Governor of Kerala. Chief Justice of Kerala High Court Justice Manjula Chelloor administered the oath of the office and secrecy at Raj Bhavan in Thiruvananthapuram to him. 
Sanjay Dutt- The Supreme Court of India, on 21 March 2013 sentenced Bollywood star Sanjay Dutt to a sentence of 5 years in jail because of his association with the 1993 bombings in Mumbai. The decision was given by a bench of Justice PS Sathasivam and BS Chauhan. Sanjay Dutt, 53, was held for acquiring illegal weapons for Mumbai bombings in 1993 which killed 257 people. 
Mukesh Ambani - Mukesh Ambani retained his title as the richest person of India for the sixth consecutive year with the net worth of 21.5 billion US Dollars, according to the annual rankings published by Forbes on 4 March 2013. The richest man in the world for fourth time in a row was Mexican business tycoon Carlos Slim with the net worth of 73 billion US Dollars. 
AK Singh- The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 11 February 2013 removed the public prosecutor AK Singh from the 2G Spectrum Case. The decision of removal came after the alleged public prosecutor was caught discussing the strategy of prosecution with one of the prime accused of the 2G Spectrum Allocation Case in a taped conversation. 
Afzal Guru- Mohamammed Afzal Guru, the convict of 2001 Parliament attack was hanged on 9 February 2013 at 8 AM in Tihar Jail, New Delhi. The Supreme Court of India pronounced the death Sentence for Afzal Guru in 2004 for masterminding the terrorist attack on Indian Parliament on 13 December 2001. 
Shah Rukh Khan- Shah Rukh Khan attempted to end the controversy over his article on Being a Khan to the Outlook Turning Points 2013 . A controversy sparked over his article to the Outlook Turning Points magazine where he talked about being a Muslim in India. Shah Rukh Khan, the Bollywood superstar topped the inaugural Forbes India Celebrity 100 list. 
Sreeramamurthy Janaki- Sreeramamurthy Janaki, the renowned playback singer, refused to accept the Padma Bhushan award. She refused on the grounds that only some people from the Southern states were awarded and that honour given to her was too late. The padma awards are announced every year on the occasion of Republic Day. Apart from Janaki, the other person from Tamil Nadu who was chosen for the Padma Bhusan was industrialist Ramamurthy Thyagarajan.
Saina Nehwal -The Election Commission (EC) of India on 22 January 2013 announced Saina Nehwal and Mary Kom as the National Icons to help promote, voter participation in India. Saina Nehwal and Mary Kom, both are Olympic Bronze Medalists in the London Olympics 2012, in Badminton and Boxing respectively. 
Rajnath Singh- on 23 January 2013 elected Rajnath Singh as its new President. His appointment to the post was announced by Thawar Chand Gehlot, the Central Election Officer at the headquarters of the party, at New Delhi. Rajnath Singh replaced Nitin Gadkari, who served the party as its President for a period of three years from December 2009 to January 2013. 
Om Prakash Chautala- The Delhi Court on 22 January 2013 sentenced 10 years in prison for the former Chief Minister of Haryana and the leader of the National Lok Dal (INLD) Om Prakash Chautala and his Son Ajay Singh Chautala, who is an MLA from Dabwali constituency. The two along with 53 others have been sentenced for their alleged involvement in the Junior Basic Trained (JBT) teachers’ recruitment scam in which 3,206 JBT teachers were recruited illegally in the state in the year 2000.
Kalyan Singh -Kalyan Singh, the former Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh on 21 January 2013 merged his Jan Kranti Party with Bhartiya Janta Party. Singh merged his party with BJP during the Atal Shankhnaad Rally of BJP in Lucknow’s Jhelum Park. 
Akbaruddin Owaisi-  Akbaruddin Owaisi, the Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) MLA who was indicted of making hate speech was arrested on 8 January 2013 after going through the medical tests in government hospital in Hyderabad. The MLA on 7 January 2013 sought time of four days for appearing in front of the police on certain medical grounds. 
Sunmeet Kaur Sawhney -Sunmeet Kaur Sawhney, a housewife from the state of Punjab in January 2013 emerged as the first woman to win 5 crore rupees on the TV game show Kaun Banega Crorepati 6 (KBC).
 Naina Lal Kidwai- Naina Lal Kidwai on 15 December 2012 took over as President of FICCI (Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry), becoming the first woman to head the leading industry body. Kidwai, is the first woman and professional manager to be elected as President of the chamber. She is 55 years old.  Chairman of Digjam Ltd, Sidharth Birla was elected as Senior Vice-President of FICCI.
Bhanu Athaiya- Bhanu Athaiya, the first Indian to win an Oscar for costume design in the movie Gandhidecided to return her award to the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) in December 2012. Bhanu Athaiya fears that she might lose her trophy as the government might not be able to protect it.
Ram Jethmalani- The BJP(Bhartiya Janta Party) on 25 November 2012 suspended senior leader and Rajya Sabha member Ram Jethmalani from the party for gross indiscipline. Ram Jethmalani recently, openly attacked the party for criticizing the appointment of the new CBI chief. He had also challenged the party to take action against him on the issue. 
Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab-  Mohammed Ajmal Amir Kasab, the Pakistani National and the lone surviving terrorist of 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attacks, was hanged on 21 November 2012 at Pune’s Yerwada Jail . The President of India Pranab Mukherjee rejected the mercy plea of Kasab.He was hanged five days before the fourth anniversary of the brutal terror attack on Mumbai that claimed 166 lives and sieged Mumbai for continuous three days.
Irom Sharmila - Iron Lady from Manipur, Irom Sharmila on 5 November 2012 completed 12 years of her fast demanding cancellation of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958  (AFSPA). She blames AFPSA as the main cause for violence in the state of Manipur and other parts of Northeastern India. Sharmila began her fast till death after ten persons, including a boy who received the National Bravery Award, were shot dead in an alleged encounter with Assam Rifles personnel at Malom near Imphal Airport on November 2, 2000. 
Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam- China on 2 November 2012 invited Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, the former President and Missile Man of India to teach at the Peking University of China. The nation also offered him the lab of his choice to work on with the students. The invitation came up during Dr. Kalam’s visit to the Beijing Forum by the Chairperson Zhu Shanlu of Peking University. 
Anand Kumar- Anand Kumar, teacher and founder of Super 30 institute, which provides free residential coaching to students from economically backward families for IIT-JEE exams, named 'People's Hero' by People magazine of American Time Magazine Group.

The Justice System


The justice system in India is passing through an extremely difficult period, for which there are a number of reasons. Let us start with the basics, that is, the separation of powers. In this a very special position is given to the Judiciary which makes it totally independent of the Executive. This is most praiseworthy, but it would be futile to deny that the system is under stress. As the Executive fails to perform its functions of governing, as people develop a feeling that they cannot expect fairness, impartiality and efficiency from the Executive, recourse to the courts has increased substantially and in matters in which the Executive should have taken a decision the Judiciary is being forced to intervene so that people receive their due, especially in terms of delivery of services. Because it is impossible to maintain an absolutely fine-tuned balance when one constituent of the State is forced to order another, equal constituent to act in a particular way or desist from acting in another way, there are bound to be complaints that the Judiciary is intervening in executive matters. Looked at from the citizens’ point of view this is just fine because he is interested in his legitimate work being done. That, however, is not how the Executive views it. There have also been instances of clashes between the Judiciary and the Legislature, but fortunately the stand-off has never reached the point of irreversible crisis. However, the Executive must begin to govern and its lowliest functionary must being to do his duty as mandated by law, rules or executive order. If that happens people will find it unnecessary go to the Judiciary for remedy and courts can then go back to their main function of deciding issues between adversaries.
One of the areas of conflict is in the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Article 124 of the Constitution states how a judge of the Supreme Court may be appointed. Article 217 provides for the appointment of High Court judges. The operative part of Article 124 (2) reads, “Every judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five : Provided that in the case of appointment of a judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted”. Under Article 217 for the appointment of a judge of a High Court the President is the appointing authority and he is required to decide on such appointment in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, Governor of the State and, in the case of appointment of a judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned”. The Supreme Court has ruled that consultation with the Chief Justice of India establishes the primacy of the Chief Justice in determining who shall or shall not be appointed a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court. The Supreme Court has further ordered that it is a collegium of judges, to be selected by the Chief Justice which will help the Chief Justice to determine what advice should be rendered to the President regarding the appointment of a judge.
I have serious objection to the concept of a collegium of judges which limits the power of the President to consult such judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts as he deems necessary, which is what Article 124 (2) states. I do not think that the Supreme Court can thus limit the authority of the President regarding consultation which vests in him through the Constitution, though the Chief Justice of India would be free to set up a collegium to advise him on the recommendations to be made on consultation. The question still remains about how a conflict will be resolved where the collegium advises the Chief Justice in a particular way and the judges whom the President consults give some other advice. The third player would be the Council of Ministers, whom the President is bound to consult before taking a decision because under the Constitution he is bound by the advice of the Council. This would apply to the Governor of a State also who, when consulted by the President about appointment of a High Court judge, would naturally have to abide by the advice given to him by his Council. In other words, the present provisions of the Constitution and their interpretation by the Supreme Court do leave open the gates of disagreement and even conflict because whereas the President may not appoint a judge whom the Chief Justice of India and the collegium have found unfit, he need not appoint a person recommended by the Chief Justice. In fact many vacancies in the High Courts and the Supreme Court have not been filled on account of such conflict.
Government has been trying to set up a National Judicial Commission, to be headed by the Chief Justice of India and with adequate representation of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The Commission, as envisaged, would have the Law Minister, the Leader of the Opposition of one of the two Houses of Parliament and an eminent jurist nominated by the President as members. Justice J.S. Verma, Justice V.N. Khare, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer and Justice M.N. Venkatachalliah are all opposed to the collegium system. Perhaps the issue could be resolved if the proposed National Judicial Commission could have a majority of judicial members, with the Chief Justice having a veto power and if the eminent jurist is nominated by the Chief Justice of India rather than the President. Suitable constitutional and legal arrangement could be made for the advice of the National Judicial Commission being final, with neither the President nor the Prime Minister being authorised to overrule it. Without bringing the Executive into the process for the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, such an arrangement would widen the scope of the required consultation with the Chief Justice and by bringing the government, the opposition and the Bar on board through an eminent jurist, the system of appointment of judges could be made more broad based and more credible.
An independent judiciary is a sine qua non of a true democracy. However, the only system of governance in which authority does not go hand in hand with accountability is a dictatorship of the type established by Hitler or Stalin. This means that the more independent the judiciary the more should it be accountable. Accountability which does not lead to penalty for failure to discharge accountability satisfactorily is no accountability. Under Article 227 courts and tribunals located within the jurisdiction of a High Court work under the superintendence of the High Court and in exercise of the power of superintendence the High Court can call the court or tribunal to account. Under Chapter 6 of Part VI of the Constitution the District and Sessions Courts and the Courts of Magistrates and Civil Judges are termed as subordinate courts and under Article 235 control over subordinate courts vests fully in the High Courts. The Constitution, therefore, provides for High Courts to decide how subordinate courts will function, to prescribe measures to ensure accountability and to punish for failure to render account, in terms of finance, efficiency, judicial competence, etc. But what about the High Courts and the Supreme Court? Their judicial pronouncements are open to appeal, revision and review, but administrative and personal conduct are not subject to the superintendence, supervision or control of any judicial authority. If a judge does little or no work, is not regular in attendance, delays judicial pronouncements, does not promote efficient judicial process in his own court or in subordinate courts the maximum that can happen is that under Article 222, on the advice of the Chief Justice of India, the President may transfer a judge from one High Court to another. If there is serious misconduct the procedure laid down in Article 124 (4), it would be applicable. For High Court judges Article 218 would apply, which means that a Supreme Court or High Court judge can only be removed through impeachment proceedings. There is no other penalty prescribed, but as the Justice Ramaswamy case has proved, if equations in Parliament are such that the necessary majority cannot be mustered, a judge found guilty of misconduct by a tribunal constituted under Article 124 (4 and (5) the judge may still escape removal. Carried one step further, if a judge is found guilty in a criminal trial, convicted and given a jail sentence, the impeachment proceedings can still fail and the convict would continue to be a judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court. This may happen in the case of a lady judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court who has been accused of taking a bribe. Government, Parliament and the Supreme Court must realise that what could never be dreamt of when the Constitution was drafted, that is, a judge of a High Court or Supreme Court committing a criminal misdemeanor, can no longer be ignored and, therefore, we must have a constitutional provision whereby in such cases, while taking great care to ensure that the independence of the judiciary is not thereby compromised, such a judge can be made to demit office.
The major problem with our subordinate courts from District and Sessions Courts down to a Magistrate First Class cum Civil Judge Class Two is that cases drag on for years. Formerly civil litigations were considered to be very lengthy and time consuming, but now unfortunately even the criminal justice system has become subject to inordinate delay. I have perhaps quoted this case else where, but it bears repetition. In Mach 1983 shortly before I left the Service we trapped a lady who was trying to bribe a Deputy Secretary. He had already reported that such an attempt was being made and we arranged a trap, catching the lady red handed. My evidence was proforma, but necessary because the bribe was being offered for expeditious processing of a case in which the accused person’s application to me had been forwarded by me to the Deputy Secretary for examination. It took eleven years for my evidence to be recorded because every time I went for a hearing the accused, by absence, by subterfuge, by downright lies was able to obtain adjournments. The case was finally decided fifteen years after the event. What is the deterrent effect of such proceedings? How can witnesses be expected to remember an event which happened several years earlier and give testimony which could withstand cross examination, the purpose of which is to discredit the witness? This was a simple case with only three or four witnesses, but imagine what happens in a serious case in which a heinous offence has been committed and there are a large number of witnesses. No wonder we have such a miserable record of convictions.
I have been trying to understand why cases are delayed. I am not even attempting to look at civil cases because that will require several volumes. In a criminal trial the first delay occurs at the stage of investigation. The available clues may be either so few as to be almost nonexistent, witnesses may not be available, the forensic tests may be inconclusive, the investigating officer may be overburdened and can give only limited time to a particular offence, the accused and the witnesses or even the complainant may come to some compromise or there could be sheer inefficiency. This is where superior police officers have a major role to play to ensure that investigation is consistent, sustained and done with intelligence. Forensic and other support must be made available freely to the investigating team. The legal niceties of investigation must also be taken care of. The submission of the challan must be accompanied by full documentation so that the charge-sheet is complete in itself. This has to be followed up by proper representation of the prosecution in court, with the public prosecutor and his assistants applying due diligence to the case. If the public prosecutor is wide awake and proactive many of the delays in court can be avoided.
One reason for delay is in the serving of process. The court moharrir, who would generally be from the police, or the reader of the magistrate or judge, would be responsible for issue of process which, in criminal cases, would generally be served by the police. The arrangement is not satisfactory and most courts report that service of process is tardy and very often summons and warrants are just not served in collusion with the accused or the witnesses. Surely, with modern means of communications, with speed post, courier service, SMS texting and the internet the High Courts can work out a system whereby service of process becomes efficient and cannot be used as an excuse for delay in court proceedings. Our courts cannot function in the eighteenth century when the twenty-first century gives such exciting and innovative means of communication, or are they waiting for that happy day when science evolves a means of apparatus-less communication of thought process whereby what the judge thinks is communicated to the witness or accused by a para-psychic process? Coming to the trial proper, defence counsels are prone to pleading for adjournments, especially in those cases where the defence case is weak. Adjournments must be avoided because whereas an adjournment which is unavoidable is given, in most cases adjournment is denied. It is for learned counsel to adjust their cause list in such a way that appearance in one court cannot be offered as an excuse for nonappearance in another court. There is no reason for a judge to give an adjournment only for the sake of convenience of counsel. Every defence counsel is an officer of the court and it is his duty to assist the court in speedy disposal of a case. A counsel who acts otherwise fails in his duty and should be treated as such.
I have talked to a number of judges and magistrates about why they are not strict in the matter of adjournment. Under Article 21 of the Constitution every person, including one accused of a heinous offence, is still entitled to be tried by due process before being deprived of his life or personal liberty. Under Article 22 a person who is arrested and detained in custody has the right to be informed of the grounds for arrest, he has the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner and he cannot be detained in police custody beyond twenty-four hours of arrest without the orders of a magistrate. Under Article 39 (A) every citizen is entitled to equal justice. This is enforceable by the provisions of Articles 139 and 226 which confer writ jurisdiction on the Supreme Court and the High Courts. The Code of Criminal Procedure prescribes the process of trial in criminal cases. Chapters XVI and XIX of Cr.P.C. state how proceedings shall be conducted before a Magistrate and Chapter XVIII does the same for trial before a court of session. Under sections 231 and 233 Cr.P.C. an accused person has the right to cross examine the prosecution witnesses and to enter upon his own defence and adduce evidence in this behalf. Suppose an accused person deliberately delays the taking of evidence for the prosecution and indefinitely defers his own defence. Should the court indulge him and go on giving adjournments indefinitely, as happened in the bribery case to which I have earlier referred? Under Indian law a person is deemed to be innocent till proved guilty but there is no provision of law which says that an accused and his counsel can go on creating obstruction so that the trial is indefinitely delayed. In other words, an opportunity, a manifestly fair opportunity, must be given to the accused on trial to present his case, but when the accused tries to indefinitely delay the matter the court need not succumb. Under section 309 Cr.P.C. the provision is, “In every enquiry or trial the proceedings shall be held as expeditiously as possible and, in particular, when the examination of witnesses has once begun, the same shall be continued from day-to-day until all the witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless the court finds the adjournment of the same beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded”. The proviso to this section states that any trial relating to an offence under section 376 and 376(D) of IPC (sexual offence amounting to rape) must be completed within a period of two months from the date of commencement of the examination of witnesses. The scheme of Cr.P.C. is very clear, the accused is entitled to a fair trial, but he is not thereby entitled to indefinite delay.
I have spoken to some judges about why they so readily give adjournments. Even the most conscientious of them state that if they do not give an adjournment there are many defence lawyers who indulge in making complaints against the judge and, by and large, the High Courts tend to be more sympathetic to defence counsel than to their own judges. Rather than face such complaints many judges take the easy way out and adjourn the case. One of the things which many judges have forgotten is that bail is also a form of custody in which instead of physically holding the accused the court permits enlargement on bail, whereby surety of appearance is substituted for physical custody. If the accused person deliberately delays proceedings by non appearance or such other tactics it would be legitimate for the court to hold the person in physical custody and to proceed with the case on a day-to-day basis. The Supreme Court and the High Courts must try and move the courts in this direction. Greater adoption of evidence through video conferencing and other means of electronic recording of evidence would also help in expediting cases.
There are some recent developments which are causing me worry. The first is that recent rape cases have certainly shaken the nation, with the Chief Justice of India going as far as to say that he would have personally liked to participate in the public protest. Perhaps he was ill advised to make this statement because in a way he thus pre judges even the specific case under mention, which means that no trial court in India would hereafter readily acquit a person in such matters unless no case at all is made out and this could lead to mistrial of rape cases and denial of justice to the accused persons. We have seen a whole spate of very speedy trials, some lasting only for ten days, in which the accused has been sentenced to death. Murder, whether or not accompanied by rape, is the ultimate crime because it irreversibly deprives a person of his life. The accused also faces possible judicial termination of his life at the end of the trial and, therefore, courts have to be extra careful to ensure that the accused has full and fair opportunity to represent his or her case and that there is no miscarriage of justice through haste. The Supreme Court and the High Courts for years have ruled that there should be extreme caution in awarding the death penalty and that, too, only in the rarest of rare cases. In sharp contrast in at least half a dozen cases in the last two or three months rapists have been awarded the death penalty after trials which smack of the summary. The judiciary cannot swing between two extremes because our politicians, civil servants and the so-called civil society are already doing this. Certainly the judiciary should enforce the law with great strictness and there should be no misplaced and pseudo philanthropic attitude towards crime. At the time same justice has to be done because two principles of Anglo Saxon Jurisprudence that we follow are :- (1) An accused is presumed to be innocent till proved guilty, with the burden of proof of guilt resting on the prosecution. (2) It is better that a hundred guilty people go free rather than that one innocent person be punished. It is for the judiciary to ensure that the balance is maintained, the innocent are protected and at the same time the guilty are brought to justice in the shortest possible time.


कुल पेज दृश्य